<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Up-Load dot com &#187; news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.up-load.com/tag/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.up-load.com</link>
	<description>Inconstant content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Barbara Boxer Calls Foul on General&#8217;s Protocol</title>
		<link>http://www.up-load.com/current-affairs/senator-barbara-boxer-calls-foul-on-generals-protocol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.up-load.com/current-affairs/senator-barbara-boxer-calls-foul-on-generals-protocol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.up-load.com/?p=429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bloggers from the right have gotten their collective knickers in a twist over a moment from Wednesday's Environment and Public Works committee hearing in which California Senator Barbara Boxer interrupted testimony by Brigadier General Michael Walsh to request he not refer to her as "ma'am." Boxer: You know, do me a favor. Could say 'senator' instead [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.up-load.com/current-affairs/senator-barbara-boxer-calls-foul-on-generals-protocol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC: bias or blasé?</title>
		<link>http://www.up-load.com/current-affairs/bbc-bias-or-blas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.up-load.com/current-affairs/bbc-bias-or-blas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 02:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://up-load.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inherent bias makes the media go round Much print and electronic press has been devoted to discussions of whether news media, particularly the British Broadcasting Company, perpetuate an anti- (or pro-) Israel bias. The seldom stated, but often whispered truth of the matter is that all newsreporting is inherently biased— towards the story that's most [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.up-load.com/current-affairs/bbc-bias-or-blas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
