Backpatting, Wiki-style
As the three regular readers of my blog may know, I've been a Wikipedia-addict for the past two years. This is, perhaps not so coincidentally how long the series Lost has been on the air. Since last year, I've been a regular (perhaps excessively so) editor for the show's article -- and now, it's all worth it: check out today's featured article on Wikipedia's Main Page (October 3).
Oh, and Lost is back on Wednesday-- not that I have to remind my quarter-of-a-dozen readers. I'm sure I'm going to find something wrong with it too.
Incidentally, the best pilot I've seen thus far this season is Dexter, a procedural with a psychotic twist, which may be Showtime's answer to The Sopranos. Think CSI crossed with Hannibal Lecter. If you don't get Showtime, you can check it out for free on their secret promotional site (Password: "sneak peak"). Definitely not for the squimish, though.
Domain Transfer Round 2: GoDaddy’s uppercut
Those of you who follow my every scintillating online exploit may recall that I recently had a bout with so-called "World's No. 1 ICANN-accredited domain name registrar" GoDaddy.com.
Seems like Go Daddy is particularly keen about holding onto its slim "dominance" of low-cost domain registration space. On his "personal" blog, company founder and CEO Bob Parsons goes all out, front and center, to rail against what he perceives is the inequity of ICANN granting Verisign/Internic a license to print money (while poor 'ol Bob can only mint a couple hundred mil.) So it's little surprise that with another company offering Dot-Com registration at prices that make even GD's seem inflated, some "roadblocks" seem to get put up when trying to move domains.
Latest case in point: my requests to transfer my remaining domains away from Go Daddy are getting denied with claims that they have "express written objection" to such transfers. Huh? From whom? 'Cause I seem to recall giving express written (well, electronic) consent to 1and1.com to get my domains... twice already!
Apple wins computer wars. News at 11.
Today Apple announced a small but massively important beta application called "Boot Camp" -- a masterstroke which may just explode the userbase for Apple's computers. The software lets new Intel-based Macs (AKA "MacIntel") install Windows. Let me repeat that: Mac now does Windows... natively. Last week, a couple of hackers won fame (and $12,000) for coming up with their own solution, which involved owning an actual PC, burning a custom Windows install disk, using three rolls of duct tape, two cases of "Orange Shasta" plus a sacrifice of a small marsupial to the angry "B'lgateus" demon.
Running Windows on Macs something that has been tried before in various ways, but never satisfactorily. A decade ago, Apple released a kludgy option of having a "DOS compatibility card" installed inside first generation PowerMacs. It was basically an 486-era computer-on-a-card, stuck inside a Mac; it had its own processor, memory and video output, but its price was comparable to buying an entirely new PC. Suffice it to say, it wasn't the most popular of add-ons. It was eventually replaced with a "PC Compatibility Card" using a PCI interface, with a 100Mhz Pentium which could be installed in nearly all pre-OS X PowerMacs. And there have been number "emulators" which ran Windows in a software environment-- the most famous being VirtualPC, which was bought out by Microsoft a couple of years ago, who brought out updates through the G5 processor line. Since Apple switched to Intel chips, the Microsofties have been silent as to the future of the product, but it's unlikely now that VirtualPC for Intel Macs will ever happen.
Followup coverage: different views on the same process
* "You need to download the Boot Camp software and step through an installation process that will be daunting to non-expert users. At one point, if you accidentally make the wrong selection, you can erase the Mac operating system from your computer." (Macs running Windows won't shift balance, Mike Landberg, Mercury News.)
* "Aside from the C: drive caution, it's almost impossible to make a mistake if you pay attention to Boot Camp's onscreen instructions. As I write this brief report, the iMac functions flawlessly in either Mac OS X or Windows mode." (I Install Windows XP on a MacIntel, Gene Steinberg, MacNightOwl.com.)
Domain registrars beg not to transfer
So I own a bunch of domain names. We're talking about random domains purchased at the tail-end of the dot-com bubble, when everyone thought that getting a Dot-Com was like buying a piece of virtual real estate. Thus was the origin of "UP-LOAD.com" which was picked up six or so years ago with the silly idea that it sounded like a name someone might want someday. (Turns out, that someone was me.) Likewise, I bought a dozen more over the years, with an occasional one getting attention, and offers for remunerations. (That's a fancy way of saying that someone once actually paid me the BIG BUCKS to acquire a domain name.)
On Blogging and Jewiness
My most brilliant blog friend, Esther, of MyUrbanKvetch.com, recently sent around a query for a new article about how blogging connects to one's Jewishness. Asketh she:
How does your involvement in Jewish blogging (as a blog writer, reader or commenter) inform or expand your Jewish (or spiritual) identity?
Does it provide opportunities for you to become more connected to your Jewish (or spiritual) side, or does the anonymity of the internet create a certain sense of removal and/or disconnect?
To which I provided a long-winded response, in keeping with my often pedantic tone: